tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-78338823008548428972024-02-20T16:27:25.991-08:00Haven/Bastion LawKaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.comBlogger68125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-85303211513794621642013-08-11T14:42:00.002-07:002013-08-11T14:42:44.882-07:00HBL A0068 - Personal Databasebe it established that the government shall create a personal database for all persons. this PDB will include different sections including school, work, citizenship, medical, personal, sexual, and so forth.<br />
<br />
each item in the database will have an associated permission for each person or group of people with regards to levels of access. for example, whether or not you are home will be green if you are home and they are allowed to know it, red if you are not home and they are allowed to know, and yellow if they are not allowed to know. another example may be green means i'm interested in toy trains and everyone can know about it, red i'm not interested in toy trains or i don't want anyone to know whether i am, and yellow if whether you can know is dependent on some other criteria which may or may not have been met or if you aren't allowed to know. the only information which is certain is if you definitely want someone to know that the answer to their query is yes.<br />
<br />
orange can be used for when you don't want someone to know something, but you want them to know that you don't want to know it and blue can be used for when you do want someone to know something but it's dependent on other criteria that haven't been met. think of blue as a waiting for confirmation state and orange as a personalised negative.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-49111918043465644192013-02-28T11:17:00.001-08:002013-02-28T11:17:31.106-08:00HBL-A0067 - Right to MemoryBe it resolved that...<br />
<br />
each person has an absolute right to record anything he senses for his own future use. Other uses may be constrained according to the privacy rights of others.<br />
<br />
For example; you can record anything you see but you cannot play back to other people a recording of someone in the shower that you took accidentally.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-11083638300730089452012-12-06T13:35:00.002-08:002013-02-28T11:23:21.206-08:00HBL-A0066 - Availability of Owned Goodsbe it resolved that...<br />
<br />
any commercial entity must make all of its products available for sale. this prevents items from being "just too much trouble". if someone is willing to pay the price they must be able to get the item or download the soundtrack, etc.<br />
<br />
this prevents companies from saying "we just don't do that" when they easily enough could and that's what people want. even if they have to refocus their entire company for a short time, as long as someone is willing to pay what they require to do the job (and it must be a reasonable price, not one designed to prevent having to do it at all) then they can always refocus the company back to where it was afterward, and it will never be too far from their core focus anyway. Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-2538225316596400902012-12-06T13:30:00.002-08:002012-12-06T13:33:22.764-08:00HBL-A0065 - Inappropriately Bundled Softwarebe it resolved that<br />
<br />
software may not be bundled with other software unless the user is explicitly told that they are getting a package before they make the choice.<br />
<br />
this means that there can be no "would you like to install X" when installing another program.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-82799288930592506812012-12-06T13:28:00.002-08:002012-12-06T13:28:56.945-08:00HBL-A0064 - Accurate Status Messagesbe it resolved that<br />
<br />
all status messages (such in programs - loading, buffering, etc) must accurately reflect the actual state of the program.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-27733290132003465472012-12-06T13:18:00.003-08:002012-12-06T13:19:41.544-08:00HBL-A0063 - Ownership of Medical Informationbe it resolved that...<br />
<br />
your medical records, including all raw data, are your non-assignable property. you may allow access but may not transfer ownership. this ownership is vested in your personhood, it is not a typical property right.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-45735225489579304042012-11-11T10:18:00.001-08:002012-11-11T10:18:56.600-08:00HBL-A0062 - Absolute Rights...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
every being has an absolute natural law right to do anything which is not harmful to another being. this supersedes common law and statute law by definition. if common or statute law do not protect or provide this right they are invalid. likewise, anyone who prevents someone from attempting those acts must be held liable in all courts.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-90185860539850511362012-11-09T01:14:00.003-08:002012-11-09T01:14:42.065-08:00HBL-A0061 - Haven/Bastion Dues and Taxes...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
Haven/Bastion dues, or taxes per year when appropriate be as follows:<br />
<br />
a) no more than 10% of one's personal income subject to rules governing fairness (taxes related to ones income level relative to the average)<br />
<br />
b) no less than one cent (or the smallest denomination of ones local currency) per person (sentient being).<br />
<br />
Example: with 7 billion people on earth, divided by 10,000 HB members/citizens, the base tax per person would be $700,000 x .01 = $7,000 per person, subject to part (a). the actual amount is based on the smallest local currency and so could be somewhat different from locality to locality until a single HB currency is devised.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-35136573213089428302012-10-08T13:31:00.001-07:002012-11-09T01:05:50.389-08:00HBL-A0060 - Completeness of Criminal Proceedings and Records...be it resolved that<br />
<br />
each part of a criminal case must be shown - intent, culpability, etc.<br />
<br />
the purpose of this law is to require every part of a case against someone to be clearly and simply recorded for the understanding of the layman and future use, and so that no part of a case which is a requisite part to convict be unintelligible or hidden. It also ensures that the parts can be fairly balanced by the judge by being well presented.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-32088955135082347242012-09-21T10:03:00.001-07:002012-10-08T13:30:59.253-07:00HBL-A0059 - Fair Use of Intellectual Property...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
if no free alternative is available for a system which becomes a standard, it falls under fair use doctrine;<br />
<br />
this law is to prevent patent monopolies or near-monopolies in cases where there is no reasonable alternative for those with little or no money;<br />
<br />
ideally the government will purchase into the public domain any properties that may be considered that level of social good; Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-39817433101476444912012-09-21T10:00:00.001-07:002012-09-21T10:00:17.739-07:00HBL-A0058 - Ownership of Intellectual Property...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
patents and Web Domains may not be sold or bartered;<br />
<br />
the
intent of such property rights is to provide the original creator with
control over his intellectual work. In patent cases that person is the
only one eligible to receive due compensation for his work. In Web
Domain cases, there are usually many valid uses for the same domain at
the same time. When an original user no longer requires that name it
must be forfieted into the wild for others who are just as worthy to use
it to have a chance;Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-15469646764738065842012-09-21T09:57:00.001-07:002012-09-21T09:59:06.043-07:00HBL-A0057 - Ownership of Patents...be it resolved that:<br />
patents may be owned only by individuals, not corporations;<br />
<br />
ownership of patents by corporations stifles their use. When individuals own the patents, companies will be forced to engage in competitive compensation measures with them and they will be more likely to allow the wide-spread use of their intellectual property;<br /> Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-9315719520283026222012-09-21T09:51:00.001-07:002012-09-21T09:53:16.355-07:00HBL-A0056 - Intellectual Property...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
any company whose primary means of support is owning patents, web domains, etc. is illegal. Restricting use of intellectual property without due cause is illegal;<br />
<br />
These types of property are only allowed to be owned or patented as a means of providing appropriate worth to the creator. These items are of no value to anyone unless they are actually being used. Any attempt to lock up use of an intellectual property is contrary to the point of that properties very existence;<br />
<br />
ref: HBL-A0037Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-51462267300733731022012-09-21T09:47:00.001-07:002012-09-21T09:47:47.715-07:00HBL-A0055 - Universal Enfranchisement...be it resolved that:<br /><br />whoever raises an objection to a law's usefulness or applicability will have the initial stages of that objection handled at no expense to themselves other than time. Those stages will include only material which may fit that person's view of the law except for a simple and concise breakdown of why the other side considers it valid. Any successful attack of a law which is mounted by them or their lawyers from that point on will be fully reimbursed by the government at such time as their case is successful;<br />
<br />
The intent of this law is to prevent there ever being a possibility that someone finds an unlawful situation which they cannot correct because of resource issues. Any time someone feels there is a legal matter which needs to be dealt with, they may not be required to use their own resources to bring the matter to be dealt with;<br />
<br />
Temporary: needs wording reworked. Valid under its intent, not it's specific wording. Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-34152110138069112522012-09-21T03:09:00.001-07:002012-09-21T03:09:46.246-07:00HBL-A0054 - Anti-Logic...be it resolved that:<br /><br />In this world we do things like making people pay for not having money and such. <br /><br />There may be no more obtuse form of bullshit than this. <br /><br />Making people pay for their own jail/prison stays. For the priviledge of being punished. And no, the cost is never considered to be part of the punishment. Make those who already have no money have even less, and thus less chance of ever getting ahead, and thus a greater reason to be a criminal <br /><br />Making people pay for child-support without giving them custody equal to what they pay. Now they have reason to hate. And reason to not-comply because rather than being fair to the child, the entire situation is only against them. There happens to be more than just the child's interest involved there, not that the child's interest is ever properly measured. <br /><br />Federal disaster money doesn't go to the people who had to put up with the disaster, it goes to the state, to pay for things related to the disaster. Sure, some of that money is well placed, to pay for things which affected everyone, but for the most part it's tossed into the big pot of government where they have plenty of money already by taking it from those people who were hurt. <br /><br />If you kill a pregnant woman, you get two charges. What if you didn't know she was pregnant? What if She didn't know she was pregnant? What if it was your baby and you never would have killed her had you known? What if the baby would have been stillborn? This issue was tossed into the illogic pot known as law without so much as batting an eye at the particulars which Will come up in every single individual case. <br /><br />In this country, if a woman is bothering the shit out of you, and has stolen from you, all she has to do is lie (on top of it all) and suddenly the government will be on her side. Your movements will be restricted, she will have control over where you can be by being there herself to keep you away. Rather than even examining the issue to determine whether she told the truth, you will immediately be laden with even more trouble. You will be required to take your own time, money, and trouble to court to even attempt to reverse this extreme injustice, and that doesn't even count that they'll probably take her side in any "your word against hers" scenario. In order to get back to zero you'll have to beat the case Against You, and then pay your own time and money Again to file suit against her on the Chance of getting justice. If you do anything toward justice on your own, they'll throw you in jail and complications will compound even further. Just like that, even though she was entirely in the wrong from the beginning and deserved steps taken against her, she can have your entire life ruined. This is the tip of the iceberg, it only counts general harassment, not a case like rape. Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-4784947930738754532012-09-21T02:56:00.001-07:002012-09-21T02:56:36.841-07:00HBL-A0053 - Formalizing "Ethics" and "Morals"...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
Ethics is the study of right and wrong, etc. Morals are those answers or results derived from Ethics.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-62470036964640897202012-09-21T02:53:00.001-07:002012-09-21T02:53:42.974-07:00HBL-A0052 - Passive Duty...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
every person has the natural right to do anything which does not negatively effect another. This means each person has a duty not to restrict another's right to do as they please, so long as they are not causing harm.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-85302120927726643382012-09-21T02:11:00.001-07:002012-09-21T02:11:41.257-07:00HBL-A0051 - Mean People...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
All people who are mean and uncontentious should be considered assholes. <br />
<br />All assholes should be shot. <br />
<br />Anyone who's one or the other should be slapped in the back of the head, Hard. <br /><br />There are circumstances which may arise which make it possible to OBJECTIVELY determine whether someone should be allowed to stay on the planet. The most basic and clear showing of this principle exists in relation to betraying trust, or to put it in terms of our definition of evil, to betray that which you should uphold. This is the definition of evil (HBLx)<br /><br />Person A is in need of some money, and person B who has little but can spare it for a short time loans it. Person A then does not pay person B back, even though they have the means to do so, and in fact takes other measures against person B to prevent them from being able to recover their money. There are no further particulars in this case. It requires, in order to be able to do such a thing, a character flaw so deep that there can be no doubt that person A is an asshole. The other things which have happened in their life can have no bearing on this. There is no way to morally excuse such an action and to be capable of it requires a personality that is beyond worthless. <br /><br />Because someone's most basic rights are life (because you were born with no choice), liberty (which is required to try to make any use of your life), and the pursuit of happiness (without which life and liberty are pointless), and because they infringe upon those rights of yours in the most fundamental way. Not only are they doing morally wrong, they are doing morally wrong when they are specifically supposed to, both by social and actual contract, be doing morally good.<br />
<br />
<br />
There are certain things a good person simply cannot bring themselves to do. One example of this would be to treat negatively a person who has just helped them. Another example is to hold someone responsible for something clearly beyond their control. A third example is, if they have harmed another, to react to that person's defense by attacking. These are all things that bad people commonly do, and that are ignored or justified in various ways by society. Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-30486755107616212052012-09-21T02:05:00.000-07:002012-09-21T02:41:28.382-07:00HBL-A0050 - An Analogy of Personality Types...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
People are like plant: <br />
<ul>
<li>Flowers - There are some who are just pretty or interesting to watch, such as Paris Hilton, who make the world a little nicer place to live just by existing. </li>
<li>Vegetables - Some people don't particularly contribute to the good of the world, or of society, but they try their best to be good people and any shortcomings in their actions are no fault of their own due to being misled or misinformed. They try not to harm anyone, they contribute productively in whatever way they see fit as a positive action and generally don't cause any problems for those around them.</li>
<li>Fruits - These people are the philosophers, the teachers, the activists... they both work hard to make the world a better place and do so conscientiously. Their every motive and act can be traced to a reasoned analysis of its cause and results and they are generally blameless, even overcoming some of the shortcomings pressed upon them by society. Even if they are not successful in this regard, they have done their best both to do the right thing And to fully prepare their minds with a logical framework within which to act. This is what separates them from the Vegetables - a Vegetable may do the right thing but they put little if any serious contemplation into why it is the right thing; their philosophy is immature.</li>
<li>Weeds - Everyone else is a weed, merely taking up space needed by better, more deserving beings than themselves, or a poisonous weed, dedicated to their own good at the expense of any and all who surround them. They do not deserve to be here taking up resources needed by other, good, people.</li>
</ul>
Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-4045226484741273222012-09-21T01:53:00.004-07:002012-09-21T01:53:53.418-07:00HBL-A0049 - Sexuality...be it resolved that:<br /><br />For a long time now people have had a Christian-based philosophy that pornography is bad. <br /><br />It's not. <br /><br />What IS bad is people causing so much trouble over something that's as natural as breathing or eating. There's not any possible excuse, reason, or anything that comes anywhere close to a logical point in their points of view. <br /><br />Sex, and everything related to sex, is neutral, it can be bad (and noone has anything to say about being against rape) but more often than anything else, it's good. SO, to sum up, the people who are against pornography are Assholes, both mean and unconcientious, and should therefore be shot.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-59954037235087111232012-09-21T01:51:00.004-07:002012-09-21T02:54:11.308-07:00HBL-A0048 - The "War on Drugs"...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
<br />
The United States spend Billions!! of dollars per year on the War on Drugs. Total reduction in drug use: 0. <br />
<br />
Obviously there are problems with drugs, big problems. The Real Problem isn't drug use itself, but addiction and the way society deals with drugs. Drugs are shoved into the shady corners of life, of course there will be crime related. Three's crime enough in those areas anyway, drugs are merely an exacerbating factor. <br />
<br />
If drugs were legalized (aside from ones which cause direct, personal, incontrivertable harm), this would no longer be the case. People would enjoy them with impunity and they would be awarded no greater affect than soda, cigarettes, or sugar-laden junk food. For the most part, drugs cause no problems, the War on Drugs causes problems. I don't know if you've ever tried any, but it's a fairly personal experience. A few stragglers aside, most drug use wouldn't be out in the open even if it were legalized.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-465183320848105692012-09-21T01:49:00.001-07:002012-09-21T01:49:43.874-07:00HBL-A0047 - Consent...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
In issues of consent, the determining factor must be whether the subject Would have consented if they had the knowledge and mental faculty necessary to properly make that determination for themselves. However, the consent itself may be determined by proxy, by guardian, or by presumption or default.<br />
<br />
ex: Should a mentally retarded person be forever consigned to a life of non-sexuality? Should anyone who becomes sexually active with them be held to be a criminal for violating their rights? They will never be capable of properly deciding the issue for themselves, yet they are sexual beings as much as anyone else and have the natural right to be sexually active.<br />
<br />
A guardian is appointed for such people precisely to make those determinations in cases where the subject cannot decide for themselves.<br />
<br />
This argument can be applied equally, and exactly, in the case of animals or children or people in temporary states of mental malfunction whether drunkenness, seizure, coma, etc.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-18703223137864761802012-09-21T01:40:00.001-07:002012-09-21T01:44:28.016-07:00HBL-A0046 - Children and Sex...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
As a society, we've got a hoard of double-standards regarding this issue. <br />
<br />
First of all, child pornography. This crime is unique in that the stigma and penalties associated with watching the crime being committed are similar in nature to those of committing the crime itself. Ludicrious! Since when is viewing a crime almost as bad as doing the crime? And why this particular crime? It's not illegal to have pictures of someone being shot, stabbed, etc. Hell, we see it in living color on CNN all the time. The point is, we're not holding this category of crime to any reasonable or logical standards. <br />
<br />
That all begs the question, "Is any harm actually done?" Many would say yes by default. That is an absurd, blatently illogical position. For harm to be done, they "victim" must be either unwilling or unable to make their own decisions (and there's only Potential harm there). There are several millions of people under the age of 18 who are ready, willing, and able to engage in sexual activity. Furthermore, I know personally several over 21 who are not ready, and may never be. The simple fact is, noone is really prepared their first time... nor should they be, it's a natural part of the process. The greatest expert of all, Mother Nature, says they're physically ready, noone can argue with that, and kids today may be more sophisticated culturally then ever before in history. Only in a few twisted cultures are kids not considered ready to be married off and sent on their way shortly after puberty. Granted, the more time you have to prepare, the better off you'll be, but the point stands. They are as ready as they need to be. Most kids 15-16 know more about sex now then their parents ever will. <br />
<br />
We here at Elite Inc. are firm believers in the adage "No Victim, No Crime". Whenever you try to protect someone from themselves, you do a disservice to them and a crime against freedom. It's time that people shut the fuck up about their biases and let people decide for themselves what's right and wrong for them. Being against children having sex has no moral foundation and is not supported by any known facts.<br />
<br /><br /> This is a very disturbing trend which began with child pornography, that is, the path to child pornography being outlawed. From the initial child abuse there is presumption after presumption - that the child cannot consent based on the legal age in that state, that taking pictures of the act is as bad as the act itself, that distribution of the pictures is as bad as taking pictures of the act, that acquisition of the pictures is as bad as taking pictures of the act, that viewing the pictures is as bad as the acquisition of the pictures. The point here is that things many many steps removed from the actual harm are increasingly being treated as though they are just as bad as the initial harm itself. This is a terrible path to be on. <br /><br /> Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-33769142904461007312012-09-21T01:36:00.000-07:002012-09-21T01:36:01.513-07:00HBL-A0045 - HB Structure...be it resolved that:<br /><br />Haven/Bastion (formerly Elite Inc.) can be thought of in two ways. In its current iteration it is a militarily structured organization for improving the freedoms and resources of its members. The practical way of stating that is "Resources are to be gathered for their use and to provide them with as much seperation from the rest of the world as possible" so that our standards apply rather than those of wherever they happen to be. <br /><br />Elite Inc. is also a government. We have in place a structure which would scale to cover an entire country if the opportunity or need arises. While the military structure remains intact in this larger variety, It is then relegated to those persuing official functions. <br /><br />The two types of Elite Inc. structure co-exist in harmony by variety of scale. What this means is, as the organization grows larger, more governmental functions will come into play and the military aspects will find their place as the internal workings of that government. <img src="http://havenbastion.org/Groups/Library/Private/images/structure.jpg" /> <br /><br />There are 4 main branches of Elite Inc. <br /><ol>
<li>Administration: Sets scope & policy for the organization, dictates laws & rules, Has final say over any decisions for the organization as a whole. </li>
<li>Logistics: In charge of keeping track of all Elite Inc. resources including those used by Operations, of which the Military is a part. Their rules determine resource use in the whole of the organization, but their policy is set by Administration. Some parts of logistics walk a fine line between logistics and operations such as libraries, communications and transportation. While logistics manages these resources as to their availability and tracking, Operations is in charge of the daily workings of these things. </li>
<li>Operations: This group comprises the bulk of Elite Inc. as a governmental structure. It includes the schools, courts, military, everything that makes up a typical government. </li>
<li>The Military is seperated because it includes police and court functions as well. This part of Operations is specifically watched and tightly controlled by both Administration and Oversight. </li>
<li>Oversight: This is the most important branch of Elite Inc. The governmental structure could exist without it but that is exactly where current governments fail. Checks & balances are only as good as those carrying them out. By having a seperate branch devoted to nothing but making sure everything else is properly done (following the Bill of Rights and Constitution as set forth by Administration, and less specifically, the rules of each branch internally), it is possible to let each other branch concentrate on it's duties and police itself without the normal fear of corruption. Oversight is the most autonomous branch of Elite Inc. given complete freedom to examine any aspect of any other branch. Administration and Oversight watch each other. Should a conflict arise between the two, the court system of Operations will step in as the final arbiter except in cases which concern the overall focus of the organization, in which Administration has final say. </li>
</ol>
The structure of operations is in a state of flux because of the variety of scale. Generally speaking, the military is structured near administration where it's structure was first used. Related to that are the Police and Court fuctions interacting as interpreters of the constitution and law, as well as enforcing them according to Administration dictates. generally speaking there is no need for a supreme court. every law is in constant review and if a conflict arises, administration must reword the law to eliminate it. The courts function as a means to deliver specific justice in specific cases. Their job is to sort all the specifics of particular cases and make sure every fact is accounted for and factored into their final decision. Near the military section are sections related to schooling and obtaing membership/citizenship. Futher away are things more closely related to logistics such as hospitilization, libraries (part of operations but administered by Logistics), and transportaion and communication (controlled by Operations but with Logistics keeping track of everything) <br /><br />The final structure of both Logistics and Operations is under review and will evolve as needs arise.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7833882300854842897.post-47726615811860748292012-09-21T00:54:00.002-07:002012-09-21T00:54:19.109-07:00HBL-A0044 - The Metric System...be it resolved that:<br />
<br />
HB formally adopt the metric system for most purposes<br />
<br /><br />The American Standard system of weights and measures is arcane and with no saving grace. Meanwhile the Metric System races through the rest of the world making things easy and understandable for everyone but the conservative throwbacks in this country. There is an officially government sanctioned move toward the metric system, the National Institute for Standards & Technology's aptly named <a href="http://ts.nist.gov/ts/htdocs/200/202/mpo_home.htm">Metric Program</a>. Please support them in their fight for reason.Kaiser Basileushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03077465746192192716noreply@blogger.com0